The software operator is a design pattern. A design pattern describes the approach to cover the operational tasks of an application’s implementation. The first post in this series introduced the concept of a design pattern in general. The second post covers the software operator design pattern in particular.
In the second part, we also explained that a design pattern usually covers a discussion about consequences, advantages or disadvantages. After all, a “pattern” refers to an approach that has been applied multiple times. As a consequence, this experience should be written down to help software developers make informed decisions about which design to apply.
Design forces impact the eventual solution design and may be lead to an evaluation of multiple paths until the final solution is reached (photo credit: Marko Blažević)
This third installment in our series will discuss the “so called” design forces which motivate the pattern. A discussion of design forces in general can be found in early books about software patterns. Examples include Design Patterns and elements of reusable software and the POSA series (Pattern Oriented Software Architecture).
In software development, design forces are characteristics of a use case which eventually impact a solution’s design. A very simple example is the bounded execution time in a use case for sorting data. Some sorting approaches, which would result in overly long runtimes, would be ruled out. It’s obvious that algorithms do not refer to a design; a design is about the structural arrangement of elements and their interaction. But this example shows that forces can refer to non-functional requirements.
An implementation of a design pattern can have many facets – just like a Rubics cube shot by Dev Asangbam
The concept of forces in a design pattern refers to characteristics of concrete use cases and how these s favor a particular design. Software operator patterns are usually applied in distributed systems, remote execution, cloud native deployments, server software, involving scalability and high user load – to name a few. Let’s consider some of these examples in more detail:
These three points are the main forces for software operator design pattern: distributed and remote execution, flexible operations and a composed setup. There are more forces of course and if other relevant ones should be mentioned it could be cyber security and reliability – because for the deployment of applications, the work of many depends on the proper operations and thus reliability and secure operations are equally important.
Having the forces pointed out, this series will delve into the advantages of the software operator design pattern.
Learn more about Juju and the Juju SDK – our implementation of the software operator design pattern: https://juju.is/docs/sdk
For many software teams, documentation is written after features are built and design decisions have…
With the release of the FIPS 140-3 certified cryptographic modules for Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, Canonical…
Open source libraries are repositories of code that developers can use and, depending on the…
Last year, we had the opportunity to speak at Regent’s UX Conference (Regent’s University London’s…
A government agency mandated smartcard authentication across their Ubuntu fleet. When they enabled FIPS mode…
Building telco clouds with open source At MWC Barcelona 2026, Canonical is demonstrating how telecommunications…